from €140.00
Arabians Tonka vs Camel
from €54.00
The scent fingerprint
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Arabians Tonka
In common
Exclusive to Camel
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Heart notes
the central character (1 to 4 h)
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Arabians Tonka
Camel
Seasons
Spring
Not its territory
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Not its territory
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Arabians Tonka
- saffron, woody notes: all materials absent from Camel.
- Warmth wins out, with amber and gourmand in support.
- The investment is heavier: €140.00 minimum.
- Less at ease in the “spring” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Camel
- It costs less: from €54.00, while the other starts at €140.00.
- Its pyramid opens on civet, dried fruits, incense, nowhere to be found opposite.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (7 contexts out of 8, against 5).
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — dried fruits, date are among the least common notes in our database.
The verdict
-
Best price
Camel — €54.00 at the low end, while the other starts at €140.00
-
Most enveloping
Arabians Tonka — signature carried by amber and gourmand
-
Most versatile
Camel — 7 situations out of 8 suit it, against 5 for the other
-
Most original
Camel — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (dried fruits, date)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.