from €210.00
White Neroli vs Macaque Fuji Apple
from €54.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: White Neroli 80 out of 100, Macaque Fuji Apple 80 out of 100. Aromatic: White Neroli absent, Macaque Fuji Apple 40 out of 100. Amber: White Neroli absent, Macaque Fuji Apple 40 out of 100. Fruity: White Neroli absent, Macaque Fuji Apple 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
White Neroli
Macaque Fuji Apple
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose White Neroli
Few distinguishing arguments — the two profiles are very close.
- The investment is heavier: €210.00 minimum.
Why choose Macaque Fuji Apple
- The cheaper of the two: from €54.00, against €210.00.
- It brings what the other lacks — oakmoss, apple, myrrh.
- Markedly fresher, carried by aromatic.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: hinoki, myrrh).
The verdict
-
Best price
Macaque Fuji Apple — from €54.00 against €210.00
-
Freshest
Macaque Fuji Apple — signature carried by aromatic
-
Most enveloping
Macaque Fuji Apple — signature carried by amber
-
Most original
Macaque Fuji Apple — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (hinoki, myrrh)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.