Price coming soon
Wild Fruity vs Blue Hope
from €400.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Wild Fruity 80 out of 100, Blue Hope absent. Citrus: Wild Fruity 80 out of 100, Blue Hope 80 out of 100. Gourmand: Wild Fruity 80 out of 100, Blue Hope 80 out of 100. Musky: Wild Fruity 80 out of 100, Blue Hope 80 out of 100. Leather: Wild Fruity absent, Blue Hope 80 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Wild Fruity
Blue Hope
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Wild Fruity
- Its pyramid opens on grapefruit, peach, patchouli, nowhere to be found opposite.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
Why choose Blue Hope
- cedar, castoreum, mandarin: all materials absent from Wild Fruity.
- gourmand and leather give it a roundness the other lacks.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: castoreum, saffron).
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Blue Hope — signature carried by gourmand and leather
-
Most original
Blue Hope — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (castoreum, saffron)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.