Nose: Frank Voelkl
Price coming soon
Santal 33 vs Musk Malaki
from €55.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Santal 33 85 out of 100, Musk Malaki 40 out of 100. Musky: Santal 33 40 out of 100, Musk Malaki 80 out of 100. Leather: Santal 33 65 out of 100, Musk Malaki absent. Amber: Santal 33 45 out of 100, Musk Malaki 60 out of 100. Powdery: Santal 33 50 out of 100, Musk Malaki absent. Floral: Santal 33 absent, Musk Malaki 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Musk Malaki
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Heart notes
the central character (1 to 4 h)
What are they for?
Santal 33
Musk Malaki
Seasons
Spring
Not its territory
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Suitable
Night
Very suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Santal 33
- Its pyramid opens on cardamom, iris, leather, nowhere to be found opposite.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- “spring” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Musk Malaki
- white flowers, pineapple, lily of the valley: all materials absent from Santal 33.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: white flowers, pineapple).
The verdict
-
Most versatile
Musk Malaki — at ease in 8 contexts out of 8, against 6
-
Most original
Musk Malaki — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (white flowers, pineapple)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.