Price coming soon
Jasmin 17 vs Cassiopea
from €189.84
The scent fingerprint
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Jasmin 17
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Jasmin 17
Cassiopea
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Not its territory
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Jasmin 17
- neroli: all materials absent from Cassiopea.
- 20 years of existence (2006): it has proved itself for longer.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Parfum), it should last less long.
Why choose Cassiopea
- Richer concentration (Extrait de Parfum against Eau de Parfum): higher theoretical longevity.
- Its pyramid opens on tuberose, peach, vanilla, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by gourmand.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Cassiopea — Extrait de Parfum against Eau de Parfum
-
Most enveloping
Cassiopea — signature carried by gourmand
-
Most versatile
Cassiopea — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
-
Most original
Cassiopea — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (peach, tuberose)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.