Price coming soon
Emeer vs Shaghaf Oud Aswad
from €28.50
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Emeer 56 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Aswad 80 out of 100. Amber: Emeer 70 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Aswad absent. Floral: Emeer 50 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Aswad 40 out of 100. Warm spicy: Emeer absent, Shaghaf Oud Aswad 40 out of 100. Musky: Emeer absent, Shaghaf Oud Aswad 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Emeer
- Facets Shaghaf Oud Aswad does not have: pepper.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- “summer” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Shaghaf Oud Aswad
- It brings what the other lacks — coriander, cumin, thyme.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: thyme, cumin).
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Emeer — signature carried by amber
-
Most original
Shaghaf Oud Aswad — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (thyme, cumin)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.