Price coming soon
Mûre et Musc vs Mon Paris
Nose: Olivier Cresp
from €53.60
The scent fingerprint
Fruity: Mûre et Musc 80 out of 100, Mon Paris 80 out of 100. Musky: Mûre et Musc 70 out of 100, Mon Paris 40 out of 100. Floral: Mûre et Musc 40 out of 100, Mon Paris 65 out of 100. Patchouli: Mûre et Musc absent, Mon Paris 55 out of 100. Sweet: Mûre et Musc absent, Mon Paris 50 out of 100. Green: Mûre et Musc 45 out of 100, Mon Paris absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Mûre et Musc
In common
Exclusive to Mon Paris
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Mûre et Musc
- bergamot, rose, blackcurrant: all materials absent from Mon Paris.
- Markedly fresher, carried by green.
- Launched in 1978, it has 48 years of life behind it.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Lighter concentration (Eau de Toilette): lower theoretical longevity.
Why choose Mon Paris
- It is more concentrated — Eau de Parfum where the other is eau de toilette — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Its pyramid opens on peony, strawberry, patchouli, nowhere to be found opposite.
- patchouli give it a roundness the other lacks.
- Released in 2016, when the other dates from 1978.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Mon Paris — Eau de Parfum, so more material than an eau de toilette
-
Freshest
Mûre et Musc — signature carried by green
-
Most enveloping
Mon Paris — signature carried by patchouli
-
Most original
Mon Paris — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (strawberry, peony)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.