Price coming soon
Lalique pour Homme vs Pegasus
Nose: Hamid Merati-Kashani
from €215.00
The scent fingerprint
Gourmand: Lalique pour Homme 80 out of 100, Pegasus 78 out of 100. Aromatic: Lalique pour Homme 40 out of 100, Pegasus 55 out of 100. Woody: Lalique pour Homme 40 out of 100, Pegasus 50 out of 100. Amber: Lalique pour Homme 40 out of 100, Pegasus absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Lalique pour Homme
In common
Exclusive to Pegasus
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Lalique pour Homme
- Its pyramid opens on cedar, amber, lavender, nowhere to be found opposite.
- gourmand and amber give it a roundness the other lacks.
- Launched in 1997, it has 29 years of life behind it.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Toilette), it should last less long.
Why choose Pegasus
- Eau de Parfum against eau de toilette: more material, and a longer expected longevity.
- almond, cumin, heliotrope: all materials absent from Lalique pour Homme.
- It is 14 years younger (2011 against 1997).
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — cumin, heliotrope are among the least common notes in our database.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Pegasus — Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette
-
Most enveloping
Lalique pour Homme — signature carried by gourmand and amber
-
Most original
Pegasus — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (cumin, heliotrope)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.