Price coming soon
Jimmy Choo Man Blue vs Polo Blue Parfum
from €59.90
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Jimmy Choo Man Blue 80 out of 100, Polo Blue Parfum 80 out of 100. Amber: Jimmy Choo Man Blue 53 out of 100, Polo Blue Parfum absent. Fruity: Jimmy Choo Man Blue 53 out of 100, Polo Blue Parfum 40 out of 100. Aromatic: Jimmy Choo Man Blue 40 out of 100, Polo Blue Parfum 40 out of 100. Citrus: Jimmy Choo Man Blue absent, Polo Blue Parfum 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Polo Blue Parfum
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Jimmy Choo Man Blue
- It brings what the other lacks — lavender, melon.
- Warmth wins out, with amber in support.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Toilette), it should last less long.
Why choose Polo Blue Parfum
- It is more concentrated — Extrait de Parfum where the other is eau de toilette — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Facets Jimmy Choo Man Blue does not have: clary sage, violet leaf, grapefruit.
- aromatic and citrus pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- Less at ease in the “winter” context according to our calculated profile.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Polo Blue Parfum — Extrait de Parfum against Eau de Toilette
-
Freshest
Polo Blue Parfum — signature carried by aromatic and citrus
-
Most enveloping
Jimmy Choo Man Blue — signature carried by amber
-
Most versatile
Jimmy Choo Man Blue — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.