Price coming soon
Fleur du Mâle vs Lust for Sun
from €145.00
The scent fingerprint
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Fleur du Mâle
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Fleur du Mâle
- Its pyramid opens on tonka bean, mint, nowhere to be found opposite.
- aromatic pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
Why choose Lust for Sun
- It is more concentrated — Eau de Parfum where the other is eau de toilette — so theoretically more tenacious.
- ambroxan, gardenia, monoi: all materials absent from Fleur du Mâle.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by gourmand.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — monoi, coconut are among the least common notes in our database.
- Less at ease in the “summer” context according to our calculated profile.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Lust for Sun — Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette
-
Freshest
Fleur du Mâle — signature carried by aromatic
-
Most enveloping
Lust for Sun — signature carried by gourmand
-
Most original
Lust for Sun — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (monoi, coconut)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.