from €280.00
Side Effect vs Angels' Share
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Gourmand: Side Effect 80 out of 100, Angels' Share 88 out of 100. Woody: Side Effect 60 out of 100, Angels' Share 65 out of 100. Warm spicy: Side Effect 40 out of 100, Angels' Share 55 out of 100. Amber: Side Effect 40 out of 100, Angels' Share absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Side Effect
Angels' Share
Seasons
Spring
Not its territory
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Not its territory
Not its territory
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Side Effect
- Facets Angels' Share does not have: rum, spices, amber.
- Less at ease in the “spring” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Angels' Share
- It brings what the other lacks — cognac, praline, oak wood.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (oak wood, cognac): the less conventional of the two.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
The verdict
-
Most original
Angels' Share — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (oak wood, cognac)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.