from €42.89
The Scent vs Polo Green
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Woody: The Scent absent, Polo Green 80 out of 100. Warm spicy: The Scent 62 out of 100, Polo Green 40 out of 100. Leather: The Scent 55 out of 100, Polo Green 40 out of 100. Aromatic: The Scent 45 out of 100, Polo Green 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose The Scent
- ginger, lavender, white musk: all materials absent from Polo Green.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by warm spicy and leather.
- More recent creation (2015, against 1978).
- “spring” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Polo Green
- Its pyramid opens on tobacco, cumin, geranium, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
- Launched in 1978, it has 48 years of life behind it.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
The Scent — signature carried by warm spicy and leather
-
Most versatile
Polo Green — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.