from €205.00
Encens Roi vs Shaghaf Oud Elixir
from €29.00
The scent fingerprint
Gourmand: Encens Roi 80 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Elixir 60 out of 100. Woody: Encens Roi 40 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Elixir 80 out of 100. Amber: Encens Roi 40 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Elixir 40 out of 100. Warm spicy: Encens Roi 40 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Elixir 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Encens Roi
Shaghaf Oud Elixir
Seasons
Spring
Not its territory
Not its territory
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Not its territory
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Encens Roi
- cocoa, labdanum: all materials absent from Shaghaf Oud Elixir.
- gourmand and amber give it a roundness the other lacks.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (cocoa, labdanum): the less conventional of the two.
- The more expensive of the two (from €205.00).
- Less at ease in the “office” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Shaghaf Oud Elixir
- It costs less: from €29.00, while the other starts at €205.00.
- Its pyramid opens on rose, praline, pepper, nowhere to be found opposite.
The verdict
-
Best price
Shaghaf Oud Elixir — €29.00 at the low end, while the other starts at €205.00
-
Most enveloping
Encens Roi — signature carried by gourmand and amber
-
Most original
Encens Roi — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (cocoa, labdanum)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.