Price coming soon
Nahéma vs Rose Ikebana
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Rose Ikebana
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Nahéma
Rose Ikebana
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Suitable
Very suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Suitable
Winter
Suitable
Not its territory
Moments
Office
Suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Not its territory
Night
Suitable
Not its territory
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Nahéma
- It is more concentrated — Eau de Parfum where the other is eau de toilette — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Its pyramid opens on sandalwood, vanilla, jasmine, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by gourmand.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 5.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
Why choose Rose Ikebana
- rhubarb: all materials absent from Nahéma.
- citrus pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- It is 25 years younger (2004 against 1979).
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Toilette), it should last less long.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Nahéma — Eau de Parfum, so more material than an eau de toilette
-
Freshest
Rose Ikebana — signature carried by citrus
-
Most enveloping
Nahéma — signature carried by gourmand
-
Most versatile
Nahéma — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 5
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.