Duel

Ysatis vs Shalimar

The scent fingerprint

What brings them together, what sets them apart

How they evolve on the skin

Notes shared by both perfumes.

Heart notes the central character (1 to 4 h)

What are they for?

Ysatis
Shalimar
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Not its territory
Not its territory
Everyday
Very suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?

These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.

Why choose one… or the other?

Why choose Ysatis

  • It brings what the other lacks — aldehydes, tuberose, amber.
  • It is 59 years younger (1984 against 1925).
  • Its formula is out of the ordinary — civet, aldehydes are among the least common notes in our database.
  • No tracked point of sale to date.
  • Less concentrated (Eau de Toilette), it should last less long.

Why choose Shalimar

  • Richer concentration (Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette): higher theoretical longevity.
  • Facets Ysatis does not have: bergamot, incense, lemon.
  • Warmth wins out, with amber and vanilla in support.
  • More track record: launched in 1925, it has been worn for 101 years.
  • We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.

The verdict

  • Most concentrated

    Shalimar — Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette

  • Most enveloping

    Shalimar — signature carried by amber and vanilla

  • Most original

    Ysatis — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (civet, aldehydes)

Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.

Also compared