Price coming soon
Ysatis vs Shalimar
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Ysatis 56 out of 100, Shalimar 90 out of 100. Vanilla: Ysatis absent, Shalimar 75 out of 100. Floral: Ysatis 72 out of 100, Shalimar 50 out of 100. Powdery: Ysatis 50 out of 100, Shalimar 55 out of 100. Smoky: Ysatis absent, Shalimar 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Ysatis
- It brings what the other lacks — aldehydes, tuberose, amber.
- It is 59 years younger (1984 against 1925).
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — civet, aldehydes are among the least common notes in our database.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Toilette), it should last less long.
Why choose Shalimar
- Richer concentration (Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette): higher theoretical longevity.
- Facets Ysatis does not have: bergamot, incense, lemon.
- Warmth wins out, with amber and vanilla in support.
- More track record: launched in 1925, it has been worn for 101 years.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Shalimar — Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette
-
Most enveloping
Shalimar — signature carried by amber and vanilla
-
Most original
Ysatis — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (civet, aldehydes)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.