Price coming soon
Bianco Latte vs Angel
Nose: Olivier Cresp
from €44.50
The scent fingerprint
Gourmand: Bianco Latte 85 out of 100, Angel 90 out of 100. Vanilla: Bianco Latte 75 out of 100, Angel 55 out of 100. Patchouli: Bianco Latte absent, Angel 75 out of 100. Sweet: Bianco Latte 65 out of 100, Angel 70 out of 100. Musky: Bianco Latte 40 out of 100, Angel absent. Warm spicy: Bianco Latte absent, Angel 35 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Bianco Latte
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Bianco Latte
Angel
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Not its territory
Not its territory
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Bianco Latte
- Facets Angel does not have: white musk.
- It is 27 years younger (2019 against 1992).
- No tracked point of sale to date.
Why choose Angel
- It brings what the other lacks — bergamot, patchouli, praline.
- Warmth wins out, with gourmand and patchouli in support.
- More track record: launched in 1992, it has been worn for 34 years.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (praline, cocoa): the less conventional of the two.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Angel — signature carried by gourmand and patchouli
-
Most original
Angel — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (praline, cocoa)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.