Price coming soon
Icon vs The Tragedy of Lord George
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Icon 80 out of 100, The Tragedy of Lord George 60 out of 100. Gourmand: Icon 40 out of 100, The Tragedy of Lord George 68 out of 100. Floral: Icon 60 out of 100, The Tragedy of Lord George absent. Leather: Icon 40 out of 100, The Tragedy of Lord George 50 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to The Tragedy of Lord George
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Icon
The Tragedy of Lord George
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Icon
- iris, neroli, bergamot: all materials absent from The Tragedy of Lord George.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
Why choose The Tragedy of Lord George
- Its pyramid opens on amber, cognac, violet leaf, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Warmth wins out, with gourmand and leather in support.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: orris root, cognac).
- No offer listed for the moment.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
The Tragedy of Lord George — signature carried by gourmand and leather
-
Most original
The Tragedy of Lord George — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (orris root, cognac)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.