Price coming soon
Grand Bal vs New Look 1947
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Floral: Grand Bal 80 out of 100, New Look 1947 80 out of 100. Woody: Grand Bal 53 out of 100, New Look 1947 53 out of 100. Musky: Grand Bal 53 out of 100, New Look 1947 53 out of 100. Gourmand: Grand Bal absent, New Look 1947 53 out of 100. Aromatic: Grand Bal 40 out of 100, New Look 1947 absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Grand Bal
In common
Exclusive to New Look 1947
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Grand Bal
- It brings what the other lacks — ylang-ylang, absinthe.
- Markedly fresher, carried by aromatic.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — absinthe, aldehydes are among the least common notes in our database.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Less at ease in the “winter” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose New Look 1947
- Facets Grand Bal does not have: bergamot, tonka bean, rose.
- gourmand give it a roundness the other lacks.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
- No offer listed for the moment.
The verdict
-
Freshest
Grand Bal — signature carried by aromatic
-
Most enveloping
New Look 1947 — signature carried by gourmand
-
Most versatile
New Look 1947 — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
-
Most original
Grand Bal — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (absinthe, aldehydes)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.