from €44.90
Light Blue pour Homme vs Sauvage
Nose: François Demachy
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Aromatic: Light Blue pour Homme 60 out of 100, Sauvage 90 out of 100. Citrus: Light Blue pour Homme 80 out of 100, Sauvage 35 out of 100. Fresh spicy: Light Blue pour Homme 40 out of 100, Sauvage 75 out of 100. Amber: Light Blue pour Homme absent, Sauvage 60 out of 100. Woody: Light Blue pour Homme 50 out of 100, Sauvage 45 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Light Blue pour Homme
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Light Blue pour Homme
- grapefruit, rosemary, white musk: all materials absent from Sauvage.
- Launched in 2007, it has 19 years of life behind it.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “winter” ground.
Why choose Sauvage
- Its pyramid opens on ambroxan, bergamot, lavender, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (7 contexts out of 8, against 5).
- It is 8 years younger (2015 against 2007).
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Sauvage — signature carried by amber
-
Most versatile
Sauvage — it holds 7 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 5
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.