from €165.00
Spring Flower vs Kirke
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Fruity: Spring Flower 72 out of 100, Kirke 85 out of 100. Gourmand: Spring Flower absent, Kirke 60 out of 100. Floral: Spring Flower 56 out of 100, Kirke 50 out of 100. Musky: Spring Flower 48 out of 100, Kirke 45 out of 100. Vanilla: Spring Flower absent, Kirke 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Kirke
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Spring Flower
- It brings what the other lacks — rose, melon, ambergris.
- Launched in 1996, it has 30 years of life behind it.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — melon, mimosa are among the least common notes in our database.
- “winter” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Kirke
- Facets Spring Flower does not have: blackcurrant, grapefruit, sandalwood.
- Warmth wins out, with gourmand and vanilla in support.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (8 contexts out of 8, against 6).
- Released in 2013, when the other dates from 1996.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Kirke — signature carried by gourmand and vanilla
-
Most versatile
Kirke — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
-
Most original
Spring Flower — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (melon, mimosa)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.