Duel

Royal Oud vs Isfarkand

The scent fingerprint

What brings them together, what sets them apart

How they evolve on the skin

Notes shared by both perfumes.

Heart notes the central character (1 to 4 h)
Base notes the trail that remains (4 h and more)
—

What are they for?

Royal Oud
Isfarkand
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Suitable
Winter
Suitable
Not its territory
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Not its territory
Night
Suitable
Not its territory
How is it calculated?

These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.

Why choose one… or the other?

Why choose Royal Oud

  • Its pyramid opens on sandalwood, oud, white musk, nowhere to be found opposite.
  • More versatile according to our calculated profile (8 contexts out of 8, against 5).
  • Expect €220.00 at the very least, more than its rival.

Why choose Isfarkand

  • Budget in its favour — €215.00 against €220.00.
  • mandarin: all materials absent from Royal Oud.
  • Freshness dominates, with citrus in the lead.
  • Our calculated profile does not see it on “winter” ground.

The verdict

  • Best price

    Isfarkand — from €215.00 against €220.00

  • Freshest

    Isfarkand — signature carried by citrus

  • Most versatile

    Royal Oud — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 5 for the other

Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.

Also compared