Price coming soon
Roses de Chloé vs Magnolia Bliss
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Roses de Chloé 80 out of 100, Magnolia Bliss absent. Floral: Roses de Chloé 80 out of 100, Magnolia Bliss 40 out of 100. Musky: Roses de Chloé 80 out of 100, Magnolia Bliss 80 out of 100. Citrus: Roses de Chloé 40 out of 100, Magnolia Bliss 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Magnolia Bliss
No exclusive notes.
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Roses de Chloé
- Facets Magnolia Bliss does not have: rose, amber.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
- More track record: launched in 2013, it has been worn for 13 years.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Lighter concentration (Eau de Toilette): lower theoretical longevity.
Why choose Magnolia Bliss
- Richer concentration (Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette): higher theoretical longevity.
- It is 8 years younger (2021 against 2013).
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: magnolia, bergamot).
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “winter” ground.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Magnolia Bliss — Eau de Parfum, so more material than an eau de toilette
-
Most enveloping
Roses de Chloé — signature carried by amber
-
Most versatile
Roses de Chloé — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6
-
Most original
Magnolia Bliss — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (magnolia, bergamot)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.