Price coming soon
Chloé Absolu de Parfum vs Narcotic Venus
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Chloé Absolu de Parfum 80 out of 100, Narcotic Venus 80 out of 100. Floral: Chloé Absolu de Parfum 80 out of 100, Narcotic Venus 80 out of 100. Musky: Chloé Absolu de Parfum 80 out of 100, Narcotic Venus 80 out of 100. Citrus: Chloé Absolu de Parfum 40 out of 100, Narcotic Venus 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Chloé Absolu de Parfum
Narcotic Venus
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Suitable
Suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Chloé Absolu de Parfum
- It brings what the other lacks — rose, peony.
- Released in 2017, when the other dates from 2009.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Parfum), it should last less long.
Why choose Narcotic Venus
- It is more concentrated — Extrait de Parfum where the other is eau de parfum — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Facets Chloé Absolu de Parfum does not have: tuberose, jasmine.
- Launched in 2009, it has 17 years of life behind it.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Narcotic Venus — Extrait de Parfum, so more material than an eau de parfum
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.