Price coming soon
Coromandel vs Trésor
from €36.54
The scent fingerprint
Floral: Coromandel absent, Trésor 80 out of 100. Amber: Coromandel 78 out of 100, Trésor 35 out of 100. Patchouli: Coromandel 65 out of 100, Trésor absent. Powdery: Coromandel 55 out of 100, Trésor 65 out of 100. Fruity: Coromandel absent, Trésor 55 out of 100. Vanilla: Coromandel absent, Trésor 50 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Coromandel
Exclusive to Trésor
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Coromandel
- patchouli, incense, benzoin: all materials absent from Trésor.
- Warmth wins out, with amber and patchouli in support.
- More recent creation (2007, against 1990).
- Notes that are uncommon with us (white chocolate, benzoin): the less conventional of the two.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “spring” ground.
Why choose Trésor
- Its pyramid opens on lychee, vanilla, sandalwood, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 7 situations out of 8, where the other holds 5.
- More track record: launched in 1990, it has been worn for 36 years.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Coromandel — signature carried by amber and patchouli
-
Most versatile
Trésor — 7 situations out of 8 suit it, against 5 for the other
-
The spring pick
Trésor — its scent profile is cut out for this season
-
Most original
Coromandel — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (white chocolate, benzoin)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.