Price coming soon
Must de Cartier vs Viva la Juicy
from €68.90
The scent fingerprint
Floral: Must de Cartier 80 out of 100, Viva la Juicy 40 out of 100. Gourmand: Must de Cartier 53 out of 100, Viva la Juicy 80 out of 100. Amber: Must de Cartier 53 out of 100, Viva la Juicy 40 out of 100. Woody: Must de Cartier 53 out of 100, Viva la Juicy 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Viva la Juicy
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Must de Cartier
Viva la Juicy
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Not its territory
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Must de Cartier
- Facets Viva la Juicy does not have: galbanum, rose, iris.
- 45 years of existence (1981): it has proved itself for longer.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
Why choose Viva la Juicy
- It brings what the other lacks — wild berries, honeysuckle, caramel.
- Warmth wins out, with gourmand and amber in support.
- More recent creation (2008, against 1981).
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — wild berries, honeysuckle are among the least common notes in our database.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “office” ground.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Viva la Juicy — signature carried by gourmand and amber
-
Most original
Viva la Juicy — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (wild berries, honeysuckle)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.