Price coming soon
Rose of No Man's Land vs Mûre et Musc
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Floral: Rose of No Man's Land 80 out of 100, Mûre et Musc 40 out of 100. Fruity: Rose of No Man's Land 50 out of 100, Mûre et Musc 80 out of 100. Musky: Rose of No Man's Land 45 out of 100, Mûre et Musc 70 out of 100. Green: Rose of No Man's Land absent, Mûre et Musc 45 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Rose of No Man's Land
Exclusive to Mûre et Musc
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Rose of No Man's Land
- It is more concentrated — Eau de Parfum where the other is eau de toilette — so theoretically more tenacious.
- pepper, white amber, papyrus: all materials absent from Mûre et Musc.
- It is 37 years younger (2015 against 1978).
- Notes that are uncommon with us (white amber, papyrus): the less conventional of the two.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
Why choose Mûre et Musc
- Its pyramid opens on bergamot, white musk, oakmoss, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Freshness dominates, with green in the lead.
- 48 years of existence (1978): it has proved itself for longer.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Rose of No Man's Land — an eau de parfum formula against an eau de toilette
-
Freshest
Mûre et Musc — signature carried by green
-
Most original
Rose of No Man's Land — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (white amber, papyrus)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.