Price coming soon
Back to Black vs Papilefiko
from €245.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Back to Black 80 out of 100, Papilefiko 48 out of 100. Gourmand: Back to Black 53 out of 100, Papilefiko 80 out of 100. Citrus: Back to Black 40 out of 100, Papilefiko absent. Warm spicy: Back to Black 40 out of 100, Papilefiko 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Back to Black
- Facets Papilefiko does not have: honey, saffron, cardamom.
- citrus pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
- Launched in 2009, it has 17 years of life behind it.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Lighter concentration (Eau de Parfum): lower theoretical longevity.
Why choose Papilefiko
- Richer concentration (Extrait de Parfum against Eau de Parfum): higher theoretical longevity.
- It brings what the other lacks — almond, tonka bean.
- Warmth wins out, with gourmand and warm spicy in support.
- Released in 2017, when the other dates from 2009.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “summer” ground.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Papilefiko — an extrait de parfum formula against an eau de parfum
-
Freshest
Back to Black — signature carried by citrus
-
Most enveloping
Papilefiko — signature carried by gourmand and warm spicy
-
Most versatile
Back to Black — at ease in 8 contexts out of 8, against 6
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.