Price coming soon
Burberry London for Men vs Sauvage Elixir
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Warm spicy: Burberry London for Men 40 out of 100, Sauvage Elixir 85 out of 100. Woody: Burberry London for Men 80 out of 100, Sauvage Elixir 55 out of 100. Aromatic: Burberry London for Men 40 out of 100, Sauvage Elixir 65 out of 100. Amber: Burberry London for Men absent, Sauvage Elixir 45 out of 100. Citrus: Burberry London for Men 40 out of 100, Sauvage Elixir 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Sauvage Elixir
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Burberry London for Men
- It brings what the other lacks — tobacco, leather, bergamot.
- 20 years of existence (2006): it has proved itself for longer.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (port, mimosa): the less conventional of the two.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
Why choose Sauvage Elixir
- Richer concentration (Extrait de Parfum against Eau de Toilette): higher theoretical longevity.
- Facets Burberry London for Men does not have: cardamom, patchouli, amber.
- warm spicy and amber give it a roundness the other lacks.
- It is 15 years younger (2021 against 2006).
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Sauvage Elixir — an extrait de parfum formula against an eau de toilette
-
Most enveloping
Sauvage Elixir — signature carried by warm spicy and amber
-
Most original
Burberry London for Men — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (port, mimosa)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.