from €205.00
Wood Jasmin vs Kryptonite Absolu
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Musky: Wood Jasmin 40 out of 100, Kryptonite Absolu 82 out of 100. Woody: Wood Jasmin 80 out of 100, Kryptonite Absolu 68 out of 100. Floral: Wood Jasmin 80 out of 100, Kryptonite Absolu absent. Powdery: Wood Jasmin absent, Kryptonite Absolu 55 out of 100. Aldehydic: Wood Jasmin absent, Kryptonite Absolu 45 out of 100. Gourmand: Wood Jasmin 40 out of 100, Kryptonite Absolu 42 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Wood Jasmin
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Wood Jasmin
- bergamot, rose, ylang-ylang: all materials absent from Kryptonite Absolu.
- Lighter concentration (Eau de Parfum): lower theoretical longevity.
Why choose Kryptonite Absolu
- It is more concentrated — Extrait de Parfum where the other is eau de parfum — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Its pyramid opens on aldehydes, almond, iris, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Freshness dominates, with aldehydic in the lead.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: almond, aldehydes).
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “summer” ground.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Kryptonite Absolu — Extrait de Parfum against Eau de Parfum
-
Freshest
Kryptonite Absolu — signature carried by aldehydic
-
Most original
Kryptonite Absolu — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (almond, aldehydes)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.