from €48.00
Velvet Tonka vs Shaghaf Oud Tonka
from €29.00
The scent fingerprint
Gourmand: Velvet Tonka 80 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Tonka 80 out of 100. Amber: Velvet Tonka 40 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Tonka 40 out of 100. Woody: Velvet Tonka 40 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Tonka absent. Floral: Velvet Tonka 40 out of 100, Shaghaf Oud Tonka 40 out of 100. Warm spicy: Velvet Tonka absent, Shaghaf Oud Tonka 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Shaghaf Oud Tonka
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Velvet Tonka
Shaghaf Oud Tonka
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Not its territory
Not its territory
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Velvet Tonka
- tobacco, amyris: all materials absent from Shaghaf Oud Tonka.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: amyris, almond).
- The more expensive of the two (from €48.00).
Why choose Shaghaf Oud Tonka
- It costs less: from €29.00, while the other starts at €48.00.
- Its pyramid opens on cinnamon, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Warmth wins out, with gourmand and amber in support.
The verdict
-
Best price
Shaghaf Oud Tonka — from €29.00 against €48.00
-
Most enveloping
Shaghaf Oud Tonka — signature carried by gourmand and amber
-
Most original
Velvet Tonka — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (amyris, almond)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.