from €225.00
Oud Abramad vs Santal 33
Nose: Frank Voelkl
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Oud Abramad 78 out of 100, Santal 33 85 out of 100. Leather: Oud Abramad 55 out of 100, Santal 33 65 out of 100. Amber: Oud Abramad 50 out of 100, Santal 33 45 out of 100. Powdery: Oud Abramad absent, Santal 33 50 out of 100. Musky: Oud Abramad absent, Santal 33 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Oud Abramad
Santal 33
Seasons
Spring
Not its territory
Not its territory
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Not its territory
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Oud Abramad
- oud, bergamot, rose: all materials absent from Santal 33.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by leather and amber.
- More recent creation (2019, against 2011).
- Less at ease in the “everyday” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Santal 33
- Its pyramid opens on white musk, iris, cedar, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Launched in 2011, it has 15 years of life behind it.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Oud Abramad — signature carried by leather and amber
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.