Price coming soon
Visit vs Jimmy Choo Man
from €44.95
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Visit 80 out of 100, Jimmy Choo Man 80 out of 100. Amber: Visit 53 out of 100, Jimmy Choo Man 53 out of 100. Gourmand: Visit 53 out of 100, Jimmy Choo Man 40 out of 100. Leather: Visit absent, Jimmy Choo Man 53 out of 100. Citrus: Visit 40 out of 100, Jimmy Choo Man absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Visit
- cinnamon, tonka bean, cypress: all materials absent from Jimmy Choo Man.
- Markedly fresher, carried by citrus.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
- More track record: launched in 2003, it has been worn for 23 years.
- No offer listed for the moment.
Why choose Jimmy Choo Man
- Its pyramid opens on pepper, melon, geranium, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber and leather.
- More recent creation (2014, against 2003).
- “spring” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
The verdict
-
Freshest
Visit — signature carried by citrus
-
Most enveloping
Jimmy Choo Man — signature carried by amber and leather
-
Most versatile
Visit — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.