Price coming soon
Hunter Intense vs Sparkling Jo
from €250.00
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Hunter Intense 80 out of 100, Sparkling Jo 53 out of 100. Woody: Hunter Intense 80 out of 100, Sparkling Jo 53 out of 100. Musky: Hunter Intense 80 out of 100, Sparkling Jo 80 out of 100. Citrus: Hunter Intense 40 out of 100, Sparkling Jo 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Hunter Intense
Sparkling Jo
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Hunter Intense
- Facets Sparkling Jo does not have: lavender, amber, geranium.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
Why choose Sparkling Jo
- It brings what the other lacks — champagne, pear, oak.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (champagne, oak): the less conventional of the two.
The verdict
-
Most original
Sparkling Jo — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (champagne, oak)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.