Price coming soon
Club de Nuit Sillage vs Bat (2020)
from €200.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Club de Nuit Sillage 55 out of 100, Bat (2020) 80 out of 100. Marine: Club de Nuit Sillage 75 out of 100, Bat (2020) 40 out of 100. Fruity: Club de Nuit Sillage 65 out of 100, Bat (2020) 48 out of 100. Aromatic: Club de Nuit Sillage 45 out of 100, Bat (2020) absent. Musky: Club de Nuit Sillage 40 out of 100, Bat (2020) absent. Leather: Club de Nuit Sillage absent, Bat (2020) 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Club de Nuit Sillage
In common
Exclusive to Bat (2020)
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Club de Nuit Sillage
- It brings what the other lacks — apple, rose, white musk.
- Markedly fresher, carried by marine and aromatic.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Less at ease in the “winter” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Bat (2020)
- Facets Club de Nuit Sillage does not have: hay, animal notes, fig.
- leather give it a roundness the other lacks.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: animal notes, earth).
The verdict
-
Freshest
Club de Nuit Sillage — signature carried by marine and aromatic
-
Most enveloping
Bat (2020) — signature carried by leather
-
Most versatile
Bat (2020) — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
-
Most original
Bat (2020) — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (animal notes, earth)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.