Price coming soon
Sweet Like Candy vs Juliette
from €145.00
The scent fingerprint
Fruity: Sweet Like Candy 40 out of 100, Juliette 90 out of 100. Gourmand: Sweet Like Candy 80 out of 100, Juliette absent. Floral: Sweet Like Candy 40 out of 100, Juliette 75 out of 100. Woody: Sweet Like Candy 40 out of 100, Juliette 60 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Sweet Like Candy
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Sweet Like Candy
- It brings what the other lacks — honeysuckle, blackberry, marshmallow.
- gourmand give it a roundness the other lacks.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — marshmallow, blackberry are among the least common notes in our database.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
Why choose Juliette
- Facets Sweet Like Candy does not have: ambroxan, cherry, pepper.
- “winter” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Sweet Like Candy — signature carried by gourmand
-
Most versatile
Sweet Like Candy — at ease in 8 contexts out of 8, against 6
-
Most original
Sweet Like Candy — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (marshmallow, blackberry)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.