from €217.95
Triumph of Bacchus vs Danger Absolu
from €59.90
The scent fingerprint
Gourmand: Triumph of Bacchus 40 out of 100, Danger Absolu 90 out of 100. Woody: Triumph of Bacchus 80 out of 100, Danger Absolu absent. Amber: Triumph of Bacchus 40 out of 100, Danger Absolu 75 out of 100. Fruity: Triumph of Bacchus 40 out of 100, Danger Absolu absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Triumph of Bacchus
- tobacco, patchouli, saffron: all materials absent from Danger Absolu.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 5.
- Expect €217.95 at the very least, more than its rival.
- Eau de Parfum: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
Why choose Danger Absolu
- It costs less: from €59.90, while the other starts at €217.95.
- Richer concentration (Extrait de Parfum against Eau de Parfum): higher theoretical longevity.
- Its pyramid opens on praline, caramel, chayote, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by gourmand and amber.
- Less at ease in the “spring” context according to our calculated profile.
The verdict
-
Best price
Danger Absolu — from €59.90 against €217.95
-
Most concentrated
Danger Absolu — Extrait de Parfum, so more material than an eau de parfum
-
Most enveloping
Danger Absolu — signature carried by gourmand and amber
-
Most versatile
Triumph of Bacchus — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 5 for the other
-
Most original
Danger Absolu — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (chayote, praline)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.