from €258.95
Sacred Flame vs Sweet William
from €115.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Sacred Flame 80 out of 100, Sweet William absent. Warm spicy: Sacred Flame 46 out of 100, Sweet William 80 out of 100. Amber: Sacred Flame 69 out of 100, Sweet William 40 out of 100. Floral: Sacred Flame 57 out of 100, Sweet William 40 out of 100. Gourmand: Sacred Flame absent, Sweet William 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Sacred Flame
- rose, bergamot, tuberose: all materials absent from Sweet William.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (7 contexts out of 8, against 5).
- The investment is heavier: €258.95 minimum.
Why choose Sweet William
- It costs less: from €115.00, while the other starts at €258.95.
- Its pyramid opens on styrax, cardamom, galangal, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Warmth wins out, with warm spicy and amber in support.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (galangal, styrax): the less conventional of the two.
- Less at ease in the “spring” context according to our calculated profile.
The verdict
-
Best price
Sweet William — from €115.00 against €258.95
-
Most enveloping
Sweet William — signature carried by warm spicy and amber
-
Most versatile
Sacred Flame — 7 situations out of 8 suit it, against 5 for the other
-
Most original
Sweet William — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (galangal, styrax)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.