Price coming soon
L'Aventure vs Obsession for Men
from €33.95
The scent fingerprint
Amber: L'Aventure 70 out of 100, Obsession for Men 80 out of 100. Warm spicy: L'Aventure 55 out of 100, Obsession for Men 80 out of 100. Woody: L'Aventure 50 out of 100, Obsession for Men 80 out of 100. Citrus: L'Aventure absent, Obsession for Men 80 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to L'Aventure
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose L'Aventure
- It is more concentrated — Eau de Parfum where the other is eau de toilette — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Facets Obsession for Men does not have: woody notes, apple, cinnamon.
- amber and warm spicy give it a roundness the other lacks.
- It is 30 years younger (2016 against 1986).
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Less at ease in the “spring” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Obsession for Men
- It brings what the other lacks — mandarin, bergamot, clove.
- Freshness dominates, with citrus in the lead.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 5.
- More track record: launched in 1986, it has been worn for 40 years.
- Lighter concentration (Eau de Toilette): lower theoretical longevity.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
L'Aventure — Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette
-
Freshest
Obsession for Men — signature carried by citrus
-
Most enveloping
L'Aventure — signature carried by amber and warm spicy
-
Most versatile
Obsession for Men — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 5 for the other
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.