Price coming soon
9 PM Elixir vs Le Mâle
Nose: Francis Kurkdjian
from €44.95
The scent fingerprint
Aromatic: 9 PM Elixir absent, Le Mâle 85 out of 100. Vanilla: 9 PM Elixir 56 out of 100, Le Mâle 75 out of 100. Amber: 9 PM Elixir 72 out of 100, Le Mâle 45 out of 100. Sweet: 9 PM Elixir absent, Le Mâle 60 out of 100. Warm spicy: 9 PM Elixir 50 out of 100, Le Mâle 35 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Le Mâle
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose 9 PM Elixir
- It is more concentrated — Eau de Parfum where the other is eau de toilette — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Facets Le Mâle does not have: rose, amber.
- amber and vanilla give it a roundness the other lacks.
- More recent creation (2023, against 1995).
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- “spring” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Le Mâle
- It brings what the other lacks — lavender, mint, cumin.
- Markedly fresher, carried by aromatic.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 7 situations out of 8, where the other holds 5.
- Launched in 1995, it has 31 years of life behind it.
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
9 PM Elixir — an eau de parfum formula against an eau de toilette
-
Freshest
Le Mâle — signature carried by aromatic
-
Most enveloping
9 PM Elixir — signature carried by amber and vanilla
-
Most versatile
Le Mâle — at ease in 7 contexts out of 8, against 5
-
Most original
Le Mâle — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (cumin, mint)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.