Price coming soon
Colonia vs Ô de Lancôme
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Citrus: Colonia 85 out of 100, Ô de Lancôme 74 out of 100. Aromatic: Colonia 65 out of 100, Ô de Lancôme 55 out of 100. Woody: Colonia 55 out of 100, Ô de Lancôme 48 out of 100. Green: Colonia 40 out of 100, Ô de Lancôme absent. Musky: Colonia 30 out of 100, Ô de Lancôme absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Colonia
Ô de Lancôme
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Very suitable
Very suitable
Autumn
Suitable
Suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Not its territory
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Not its territory
Not its territory
Night
Not its territory
Not its territory
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Colonia
- Its pyramid opens on lavender, rosemary, neroli, nowhere to be found opposite.
- More track record: launched in 1916, it has been worn for 110 years.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Lighter concentration (Eau de Cologne): lower theoretical longevity.
Why choose Ô de Lancôme
- Eau de Toilette against eau de cologne: more material, and a longer expected longevity.
- honeysuckle, jasmine, mandarin: all materials absent from Colonia.
- More recent creation (1969, against 1916).
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Ô de Lancôme — Eau de Toilette, so more material than an eau de cologne
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.